Begin Writing Your Own Critique of the Paper. Once you have read the article, compile your notes and develop an outline that you can follow as you write your psychology critique paper. Here's a guide that will walk you through how to structure your critique paper · A critical essay is a kind of writing that requires the student to analyze and evaluate literary or scientific work (thesis, article, report). Critical writing involves thinking and analysis of a certain issue, evaluating the evidence and arguments provided in text, and presenting and proving conclusions with evidence 1. Introduction For an effective introduction: Identify the work you are criticizing. Present a thesis. Preview your 2. Short Summary Of The Work Your summary does not need to be comprehensive. Present what the reader needs to understand 3. The Body Your argument may include sub-arguments to
How to Write a Book Critique Like a Professional
Your goal is to write a good critique or reaction paper, outline of critique paper, one that can be described as follows:. To give you an idea of how to write critiques and reaction papers, here are samples of each. They have the same subject so that the difference in content outline of critique paper the critique and the reaction paper is highlighted.
As you read samples 1 and 2 below, note also the similarities between the two. Note: Although the critique and reaction paper below are inspired by a real-life event, outline of critique paper, names of people and organizations are all invented. After reading both samples, you might have noticed that both begin with a summary of the speech. Likewise, both texts conclude with a restatement of the overall judgment of the talk, outline of critique paper, which you first read in the last sentence of paragraph 1 of both texts.
The body contents, though, are quite different. In sample 1, the writer focuses on the merits of the speech, like the use of examples in paragraphs 2 and 3 and the strength or weakness of the evidence used by the speaker to support his claim paragraph 4. Sample 2, on the other hand, is more personal. The writer talks about his or her feelings about and responses to the speech paragraph 2. At this point, you should be able to distinguish a critique from a reaction.
You should also have a good grasp of its different parts and how they are arranged. In order to write evaluative papers like critiques or reaction papers, you have to go through the following steps. Step 1: Know well the nature writing assignment, especially the subject of the critique or reaction and the analytical elements to be included in your paper. Step 2: See, listen to, or otherwise experience the work assigned for evaluation, taking careful note of important details as you do so.
Step 3: Outline your presentation, outline of critique paper, following the conventional organizational pattern for critiques and reaction papers. Step 4: Draft and edit your paper, paying careful attention to mechanical and grammatical outline of critique paper. Know the details of the writing assignment, outline of critique paper.
One of the most important steps to any writing activity is to know fully the writing requirements. Do not be afraid to ask your teacher to repeat or clarify certain instructions. Know the details of the subject. Your teacher will tell you in advance what work you will evaluate; this will give you a chance to prepare by doing some research on the background outline of critique paper the work.
Consider answering the following questions before you view the work. Not all of them need to be included in your paper, but knowing the answers to these questions may serve as outline of critique paper good preparation.
The analytical components will depend on the type of work that you are asked to evaluate. Sometimes your teacher will also be the one to decide on this. Below are a few recommended materials to help you identify analytical elements of different subjects of critiques or reaction papers. Once you know outline of critique paper writing requirements and the components of the work to be evaluated, you are ready to view, listen to, or experience it.
Take your time with this part of the process. While this part is sometimes the most entertaining in the entire process, remember that you have a purpose and that is to prepare for writing your paper. Here are a few tips on how to make the most of your viewing experience:. After outline of critique paper the work, take time to process. Try answering the following questions while the experience of the work is fresh in your mind:. You might have noticed that questions 1 to 3 ask more about your feelings towards the work or the subject.
These are the types of questions you are expected to answer in a reaction paper. Questions 5 to 7, on the other hand, appear to solicit more your judgment of a particular work in terms of its merits. These are the types of questions we answer in a critique. Question 4, on the other hand, may be answered in both types.
Of course, depending on your writing requirement, your paper may also include both your feelings and your more objective judgment, outline of critique paper. Supporting opinions to the overall judgment Support to these opinions: details about the work being evaluated.
A restatement using different wording of the overall judgment Some final thoughts of the critic or reactor, such as: suggested outline of critique paper or thoughts on the significance or practical use of the work. So as you prepare your writing outline, follow the pattern above for the presentation of content.
After outlining, start drafting your paper. Remember that a draft is your initial attempt at writing, so expect it to have plenty of room for improvement. Remember this, outline of critique paper, too. You never pass a draft to the teacher. After drafting, take time to edit and revise your work.
Grammar, mechanics, and format are significant concerns. But so is the accuracy of the factual details in your paper; make sure you check these as well. HOME CORE APPLIED ABM HUMSS TEACHER TRAINING GENERAL EDUCATION RESOURCES BLOG.
Connect with us. MLA Citation Style. It makes this judgement convincing by giving three or more depending on the length of the paper supporting evaluations of selected analytical elements of the work being evaluated. The writer shows balance by pointing out weaknesses of a work, if the overall judgement is positive, or the other way around, by recognizing strong points of a work for which the overall judgement is negative.
In his March 17 speech before University outline of critique paper St. Lance Nicolas, president of the Coalition of Philippine Reporters, shared his optimism that Philippine journalism could withstand the challenges posed by citizen journalism.
The issue of citizen journalism, as Mr. Nicolas said, is one that is relevant in the country today. Nicolas gave examples of the form this phenomenon had taken in the Philippines. But while these examples are probably the most popular—they are, after all, connected to major television networks—they are rather limited.
Nicolas did not include examples from other media platforms, like the citizen journalism pages hosted by the Internet news agency Grapher.
com and by the online versions of all the Philippine broadsheets. He should have included these because according to the website mediatrends. com, these pages receive an average of 1. Perhaps the lack of variety in Mr. However, outline of critique paper could have just named examples other than the ones he gave to have more balance in his presentation. The strongest points of Mr. He shared some compelling stories of Filipino journalists in action to prove how quickly they responded to developments and how they used social media to their advantage.
However, these are just personal stories and may not represent the state of field at present. It would have been more convincing had Mr. Nicolas added studies and other indicators as facts to support to his claim. But it could have been more so with more research-based information to balance the personal views. Andrew Auditorium before an audience of mainly BA Journalism students. He also shared his personal experience of how journalists responded to crises and their adaptation to the changes brought by social media, making his speech interesting and inspiring to its audience of future journalists who will probably face similar challenges.
Nicolas shared many riveting—and at times even funny—stories about journalists at work. As a Journalism major, such stories call to mind the reason why I chose this course in the first place. I have always believed that journalists are modern-day heroes, and Mr. On the other hand, his examples of journalists who were rooted in traditional media outline of critique paper who had also been able to take advantage of social media shows how adaptability is important in any profession, but especially in journalism which is strongly affected by rapid shifts in technology.
But overall, Mr. Box these. Balanced : How is balance shown in the two samples? Draw an asterisk beside the statements that achieve balance. An Overview of the Writing Process. In the following sections, you will examine more closely each of these steps.
Who are the people involved in creating work? What other previous works have they done? Who is the intended audience for the work? What event for example, a celebration, a competition, etc. is the work a part of?
What is the work about? What are the different analytical elements that make up the work in question? More on this in the next section c. Where and when is the work staged or exhibited? Where and when was it staged before? Where and when will it be staged after? Know the Analytical Elements of the Subject.
We have to explain what makes it good or bad. In other words, we have to be able to identify the different components of the work that we find effective or not.
Critiquing a journal article
, time: 3:18The Content and Structure of a Critique and Reaction Paper
· A critical essay is a kind of writing that requires the student to analyze and evaluate literary or scientific work (thesis, article, report). Critical writing involves thinking and analysis of a certain issue, evaluating the evidence and arguments provided in text, and presenting and proving conclusions with evidence 1. Introduction For an effective introduction: Identify the work you are criticizing. Present a thesis. Preview your 2. Short Summary Of The Work Your summary does not need to be comprehensive. Present what the reader needs to understand 3. The Body Your argument may include sub-arguments to Begin Writing Your Own Critique of the Paper. Once you have read the article, compile your notes and develop an outline that you can follow as you write your psychology critique paper. Here's a guide that will walk you through how to structure your critique paper
No comments:
Post a Comment